405 means timeout (server for one reason or another is too slow to respond).

For example, this url gives an error:

http://www.missionbibles.com/bible/category/

Look at the TITLE: “Error 404″

HTTP Header check returns a 404. You need to fix that.

To see what internal URLs are linking to it, go to View > Filters > Link Sources

The urls aren’t meant to come out color coded. I’m gettin’ ready to publish a how to on the tool, so hang on :)

I have it installed but the URLs aren’t coming out color coded and 60% are showing a status 405. I ran it on the site shown on my link here.

Thanks Again,

I’m glad you like it.

Not much else to say so here’s a random thought:

Some SEO consultants are apparently glad they don’t have to worry about clients wanting them to solve supplemental issues anymore. Why? Unlike dealing with ranking penalties and such, supplemental results are something you have some control over. It takes 3 days or less to turn a supplemental result into a “main index result.” That’s much easier to do than getting rid of a -X penalty.

Mike Grehan’s school of online marketing (SEO = dead, traffic = good marketing) is churning out some SEOs who seems to either have an aversion to anything technical or don’t understand that building a good product comes before marketing.

all the best
christoph c. cemper

Regarding the old PageRank numbers - mousing over the graphics bar displays an approximation of the numbers used. The thing is I switched over from the original PageRank algorithm, where the total domain PageRank added up to the total number of pages (e.g. a 100 page site would have a max total PageRank of 100) to a modified algorithm Michael Martinez mentioned, where all webpages’ PageRanks add up to one. So the numbers you see are way smaller than what you used to see in the PHP version.

I agree Googlers don’t like seeing SEOs and webmasters fixate on twinkering with stuff like numbers of links per page instead of focusing on what really matters most: Building a good website. But its kinda like playing good music: you can’t just have passion and a good score - if you can’t nail the technical stuff (playing notes in the right pitch, playing in rhythm) then it won’t sound like music. Optimizing a site for supplemental results isn’t like buying links or cloaking - as long as it doesn’t take up 90% of a webmasters’ time I don’t see any harm in it.

My feeling is that they [Google] would rather have less tinkering around by webmasters, seo’s etc. Unortunately with Google’s growth comes the corresponding additional competition to get on top and the rewards that brings.

I like the tool Half - only thing I sorta like from the PHP version was numeric values for PR. I find the bar images less useful actually. But that’s just me :)

Rgds
Richard

The same week I pulled 200+ SEO blog feeds from Google Reader so I can actually get some work done… go figure. The hack still shows pages that used to be labeled supplemental, so I disagree. It does help.